Teach. Facebook. Now.
We keep blocking Facebook instead of teaching it, even though most of our students use it and few understand privacy, reputation, and public exposure in that space.
From the “We Continue to Bury Our Heads in the Sand Department” comes the question (once again) why are we blocking Facebook instead of teaching it?
We mean really, if we’re on the board of ed, sitting in the superintendent’s chair, serving as principal, or even “just” a parent, how can the following reality not cause us to call a meeting and get Facebook into the curriculum:
- Upwards of 75% of the kids in our high school use Facebook.
- We need a manual to figure out how to appropriately set our privacy settings on Facebook.
- Because of that (to some extent, at least), lots of our kids are doing not so great things in public that might get them into trouble. (See below.)
- Most of the younger kids in our system are going to be on Facebook when they are in our high school.
- No one is teaching them.
Instead of teaching it, we block it. What are we afraid of? It’s not predation, though we continue to use that as the “Be Very Scared of Social Networks” part of the limited online safety curriculum that most schools do have. It’s all about reputation, and there are lots of folks out there right now damaging their reputations on Facebook, many because they don’t know any better.
For the adults in the room, here’s an experiment. Go to Openbook, a site that searches through all public accounts at Facebook, and enter your favorite bad word of the day. Be prepared… not only for some pretty vile stuff, but for much of it being posted by kids. A (somewhat censored) case in point:
Look, we don’t know how many of these kids are just angry and won’t be helped by any type of teaching. Nor do we know how many of them (or the adults that show up in the results) are just ignorant about what they are doing, or how many of them know and don’t care, or even if posts like these are just a part of youth culture. (We hope not.) But here is what we do know: the whole private/public thing is a mess right now. danah boyd sums this up really well in what we think is a must read post for educators titled “Facebook and ‘radical transparency’ (a rant)”:
Over and over again, we find that people’s mental model of who can see what doesn’t match up with reality. People think “everyone” includes everyone who searches for them on Facebook. They never imagine that “everyone” includes every third party sucking up data for goddess only knows what purpose. They think that if they lock down everything in the settings that they see, that they’re completely locked down. They don’t get that their friends lists, interests, likes, primary photo, affiliations, and other content is publicly accessible.
Interestingly, danah points out that new research is imminent that says “youth are actually much more concerned about exposure than adults these days,” an idea we can attest to with our own kids. But the point remains that whether we like it or not, Facebook has become such an integral part of the culture, especially our kids’ cultures, that to not provide them with some context for both their actions there and the opportunities for learning in similar spaces is to leave them uneducated.
We know Facebook isn’t on the test, but c’mon. It’s time it becomes a part of how we help kids live in this world.
About the author
Weblogg-ed Team — The Weblogg-ed Team is the collective byline behind our editorial coverage. We write about teaching, learning, and the institutions around them as technology and students keep moving faster than the systems built to serve them. Our work covers classroom practice, edtech and AI tools, online learning, homeschooling, digital literacy, and higher education, written for teachers, school leaders, parents, and lifelong learners who want clearer thinking than the press releases provide.
Related posts
AI in the classroom three years in: what’s working, and what isn’t
The first wave of stories about ChatGPT in schools was about cheating. The second wave was about bans. The third, finally, has been about…
What’s Changed? (2009 Version)
We always get in this reflective mood at the end of the year, trying to put some form to what’s changed, both in our own practice and in the larger conversation about schools. Despite more traveling, more PLP work, and deeper on-the-ground conversations, it still feels as if traditional practice remains deeply ingrained and truly transformative change is rare.
I Don’t Need Your Network (or Your Computer, or Your Tech Plan, or Your…)
We’ve been thinking a lot about how phones are disrupting schools and what it means when every student carries an Internet-connected device. The real issue isn’t just networks or hardware; it’s how curriculum must transform for anytime, anywhere learning with anyone in the world.