<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Networked Learning: Why Not?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://weblogg-ed.com/2008/networked-learning-why-not/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://weblogg-ed.com/2008/networked-learning-why-not/</link>
	<description>Learning with the Read/Write Web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 20:36:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Networked Learning: Why Not? - David Wu &#124; Mrs. Biddle</title>
		<link>http://weblogg-ed.com/2008/networked-learning-why-not/comment-page-1/#comment-62615</link>
		<dc:creator>Networked Learning: Why Not? - David Wu &#124; Mrs. Biddle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 18:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogg-ed.com/?p=2968#comment-62615</guid>
		<description>[...] http://weblogg-ed.com/2008/networked-learning-why-not/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://weblogg-ed.com/2008/networked-learning-why-not/" rel="nofollow">http://weblogg-ed.com/2008/networked-learning-why-not/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Purpose &#124; Learning At The LRC</title>
		<link>http://weblogg-ed.com/2008/networked-learning-why-not/comment-page-1/#comment-62419</link>
		<dc:creator>Purpose &#124; Learning At The LRC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 15:31:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogg-ed.com/?p=2968#comment-62419</guid>
		<description>[...] it out in Will Richardsons Blog  addthis_url = &#039;http%3A%2F%2Fmrsjgarcia.edublogs.org%2F2008%2F12%2F18%2Fpurpose%2F&#039;; addthis_title [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] it out in Will Richardsons Blog  addthis_url = &#8216;http%3A%2F%2Fmrsjgarcia.edublogs.org%2F2008%2F12%2F18%2Fpurpose%2F&#8217;; addthis_title [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Richardson</title>
		<link>http://weblogg-ed.com/2008/networked-learning-why-not/comment-page-1/#comment-62403</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Richardson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 11:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogg-ed.com/?p=2968#comment-62403</guid>
		<description>Hey Terry,

Always good to hear your perspective. I&#039;m sure you&#039;ve read it, but I&#039;ve been coming back to Jay Cross&#039;s &quot;Informal Learning&quot; book again and again as a great guide to thinking about all of this. I highly recommend it. 

Btw, I love the term &quot;node-ness&quot;. I add &quot;nodey&quot; as well. ;0)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Terry,</p>
<p>Always good to hear your perspective. I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;ve read it, but I&#8217;ve been coming back to Jay Cross&#8217;s &#8220;Informal Learning&#8221; book again and again as a great guide to thinking about all of this. I highly recommend it. </p>
<p>Btw, I love the term &#8220;node-ness&#8221;. I add &#8220;nodey&#8221; as well. ;0)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: This Life of Brian &#187; Blog Archive &#187; How Do We Define a School?</title>
		<link>http://weblogg-ed.com/2008/networked-learning-why-not/comment-page-1/#comment-62392</link>
		<dc:creator>This Life of Brian &#187; Blog Archive &#187; How Do We Define a School?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 04:36:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogg-ed.com/?p=2968#comment-62392</guid>
		<description>[...] up about networked learning. In my RSS feeds, I caught a quick post by Will at Weblogg-ed about what network learning looks like in the abstract along with a video shared by Steve at Teach42 that explains network learning in the K-12 context [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] up about networked learning. In my RSS feeds, I caught a quick post by Will at Weblogg-ed about what network learning looks like in the abstract along with a video shared by Steve at Teach42 that explains network learning in the K-12 context [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://weblogg-ed.com/2008/networked-learning-why-not/comment-page-1/#comment-62386</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 01:25:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogg-ed.com/?p=2968#comment-62386</guid>
		<description>I also like the illustration.  I have been using a wiki this year, and am amazed at the fear of other teachers using that learning platform.  I have contacted teachers in other states (where students have relocated too) as well as teachers within my own building.  The initial reaction is a backing away.  It seems like the twilight zone to them, very unsettling for sure.  

I teach multimedia for high schools, but I&#039;ve changed it up a bit.  I use the desktop programs, then introduce comparable web 2.0 (web-based) programs, and we then wiki - discussing, embedding, linking etc.  Thank you to Go2Web2.0.net - great directory!  Anyway, I feel my students have a broader grasp of communicating and truely utilizing the web.

IMO, I don&#039;t think a massive re-org of our system to a new technology driven form of education will occur until todays students are the teachers, and maybe more importantly until they are the administrators.  It amazes how many teachers still back away and tremble to the thought of changing and incorporating more technology to their curriculum.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also like the illustration.  I have been using a wiki this year, and am amazed at the fear of other teachers using that learning platform.  I have contacted teachers in other states (where students have relocated too) as well as teachers within my own building.  The initial reaction is a backing away.  It seems like the twilight zone to them, very unsettling for sure.  </p>
<p>I teach multimedia for high schools, but I&#8217;ve changed it up a bit.  I use the desktop programs, then introduce comparable web 2.0 (web-based) programs, and we then wiki &#8211; discussing, embedding, linking etc.  Thank you to Go2Web2.0.net &#8211; great directory!  Anyway, I feel my students have a broader grasp of communicating and truely utilizing the web.</p>
<p>IMO, I don&#8217;t think a massive re-org of our system to a new technology driven form of education will occur until todays students are the teachers, and maybe more importantly until they are the administrators.  It amazes how many teachers still back away and tremble to the thought of changing and incorporating more technology to their curriculum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2008-12-15 &#124;</title>
		<link>http://weblogg-ed.com/2008/networked-learning-why-not/comment-page-1/#comment-62295</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2008-12-15 &#124;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 09:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogg-ed.com/?p=2968#comment-62295</guid>
		<description>[...] Networked Learning: Why Not? (Weblogged) (tags: connectivism elpc3 network) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Networked Learning: Why Not? (Weblogged) (tags: connectivism elpc3 network) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry Elliott</title>
		<link>http://weblogg-ed.com/2008/networked-learning-why-not/comment-page-1/#comment-62233</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry Elliott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 11:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogg-ed.com/?p=2968#comment-62233</guid>
		<description>I have been mulling over the idea of teacher as learning broker for a long time.  Wouldn&#039;t it be great to work within an organization that helps its members learn continuously and without prejudice as to what is learned?  I want that job.  

I am also thinking about the distinction between formal and informal learning.  We are already moving toward an equalization of the two.  Or perhaps it is the complete blurring of the notion that formal learning is valued more than informal learning. I am in a newly designed doctoral program which is beginning to value learning outside the institutional channels.  In fact, because it is partly practicum-based it must value the informal.  This means that I am drawing on &quot;external&quot; sources  like the Downes/Siemens massively online Connectivism Course and MIT&#039;s OpenCourseWare as part of my doctoral education 

Of course, this begs us to consider whether anything or everything is external to one&#039;s learning.  The graphic above shows us just how fluid our learning world has become as the degrees of separation and the &quot;node-ness&quot; of the world is revealed, like the dichotomies of informal/formal and internal/external, to be another illusion cast upon the walls of Plato&#039;s cave.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been mulling over the idea of teacher as learning broker for a long time.  Wouldn&#8217;t it be great to work within an organization that helps its members learn continuously and without prejudice as to what is learned?  I want that job.  </p>
<p>I am also thinking about the distinction between formal and informal learning.  We are already moving toward an equalization of the two.  Or perhaps it is the complete blurring of the notion that formal learning is valued more than informal learning. I am in a newly designed doctoral program which is beginning to value learning outside the institutional channels.  In fact, because it is partly practicum-based it must value the informal.  This means that I am drawing on &#8220;external&#8221; sources  like the Downes/Siemens massively online Connectivism Course and MIT&#8217;s OpenCourseWare as part of my doctoral education </p>
<p>Of course, this begs us to consider whether anything or everything is external to one&#8217;s learning.  The graphic above shows us just how fluid our learning world has become as the degrees of separation and the &#8220;node-ness&#8221; of the world is revealed, like the dichotomies of informal/formal and internal/external, to be another illusion cast upon the walls of Plato&#8217;s cave.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Danger Chen &#187; So pretty&#8230; maps of networked learning</title>
		<link>http://weblogg-ed.com/2008/networked-learning-why-not/comment-page-1/#comment-62222</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Danger Chen &#187; So pretty&#8230; maps of networked learning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 04:25:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogg-ed.com/?p=2968#comment-62222</guid>
		<description>[...] Will Richardson at Weblogg-ed has a nice summary post about some other people&#8217;s posts on the future of classrooms and learning, including highlights from one by Bill Farren: Weblogg-ed » Networked Learning: Why Not? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Will Richardson at Weblogg-ed has a nice summary post about some other people&#8217;s posts on the future of classrooms and learning, including highlights from one by Bill Farren: Weblogg-ed » Networked Learning: Why Not? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Richardson</title>
		<link>http://weblogg-ed.com/2008/networked-learning-why-not/comment-page-1/#comment-62199</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Richardson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 20:12:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogg-ed.com/?p=2968#comment-62199</guid>
		<description>Linked now. Sorry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Linked now. Sorry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://weblogg-ed.com/2008/networked-learning-why-not/comment-page-1/#comment-62198</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 20:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogg-ed.com/?p=2968#comment-62198</guid>
		<description>Somewhere there&#039;s an existing whitepaper that outlines this idea very well:

 - students guide their own learning with strong connections to existing global conversations and online experts
 - classroom teachers transition from lecturers to guides that help students develop their individual plans and connect with online resources

I understand what you mean about excited and skeptical...but I think I&#039;m excited that it&#039;s probably the best way forward and skeptical that we&#039;ll be able to get rid of the red tape and nay-sayers. :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Somewhere there&#8217;s an existing whitepaper that outlines this idea very well:</p>
<p> &#8211; students guide their own learning with strong connections to existing global conversations and online experts<br />
 &#8211; classroom teachers transition from lecturers to guides that help students develop their individual plans and connect with online resources</p>
<p>I understand what you mean about excited and skeptical&#8230;but I think I&#8217;m excited that it&#8217;s probably the best way forward and skeptical that we&#8217;ll be able to get rid of the red tape and nay-sayers. <img src='http://weblogg-ed.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Britt Watwood</title>
		<link>http://weblogg-ed.com/2008/networked-learning-why-not/comment-page-1/#comment-62197</link>
		<dc:creator>Britt Watwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 20:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogg-ed.com/?p=2968#comment-62197</guid>
		<description>I love both the description and the graphic.  I think you meant to link to Bill Farren&#039;s post but no link came through.  Could you add it in the comments?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love both the description and the graphic.  I think you meant to link to Bill Farren&#8217;s post but no link came through.  Could you add it in the comments?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

