<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rethinking Schools</title>
	<atom:link href="http://weblogg-ed.com/2006/rethinking-schools/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://weblogg-ed.com/2006/rethinking-schools/</link>
	<description>Learning with the Read/Write Web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 20:36:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ideas and Thoughts from an EdTech &#187; Going back to the one room school</title>
		<link>http://weblogg-ed.com/2006/rethinking-schools/comment-page-1/#comment-6185</link>
		<dc:creator>Ideas and Thoughts from an EdTech &#187; Going back to the one room school</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 05:48:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogg-ed.com/2006/rethinking-schools/#comment-6185</guid>
		<description>[...] Harold Jarche, via Will Richardson, talks about the value and possibilties of small schools in his post Small Schools, Loosely Joined. The points I found most compelling were [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Harold Jarche, via Will Richardson, talks about the value and possibilties of small schools in his post Small Schools, Loosely Joined. The points I found most compelling were [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Taylor</title>
		<link>http://weblogg-ed.com/2006/rethinking-schools/comment-page-1/#comment-6110</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2006 01:56:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogg-ed.com/2006/rethinking-schools/#comment-6110</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s an interesting comment, Andrew.  It&#039;s funny to hear all of you speak about early grades this way when I found the exact same thing in my collegiate experience.  I had to jump through hoops last year to get an independent study project set up.  When I did, I learned far more than I ever did in any classroom or lecture hall.  I appreciated my professors&#039; expertise and teaching skills, but there was simply more to be learned by going out and doing my own research.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s an interesting comment, Andrew.  It&#8217;s funny to hear all of you speak about early grades this way when I found the exact same thing in my collegiate experience.  I had to jump through hoops last year to get an independent study project set up.  When I did, I learned far more than I ever did in any classroom or lecture hall.  I appreciated my professors&#8217; expertise and teaching skills, but there was simply more to be learned by going out and doing my own research.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Learning Is Messy - Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Society May Be Willing To Invest In Children If They Are Seen As An Immediate Value To Society</title>
		<link>http://weblogg-ed.com/2006/rethinking-schools/comment-page-1/#comment-6109</link>
		<dc:creator>Learning Is Messy - Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Society May Be Willing To Invest In Children If They Are Seen As An Immediate Value To Society</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2006 01:39:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogg-ed.com/2006/rethinking-schools/#comment-6109</guid>
		<description>[...] We of the edbloggosphere have bemoaned the snail’s pace progress in educational change. One of the issues I believe is that kids are perceived by society as only having the potential to contribute to society sometime in the future. If kids were appreciated for what they can contribute now, and that “contribution” was valued by society, perhaps society would be more willing to “invest” more substantially in them at an earlier age. One of the transformative aspects of technology is that it allows students to produce finished products that others have access to and can use: Other students, other members of the local community and members of the global community. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] We of the edbloggosphere have bemoaned the snail’s pace progress in educational change. One of the issues I believe is that kids are perceived by society as only having the potential to contribute to society sometime in the future. If kids were appreciated for what they can contribute now, and that “contribution” was valued by society, perhaps society would be more willing to “invest” more substantially in them at an earlier age. One of the transformative aspects of technology is that it allows students to produce finished products that others have access to and can use: Other students, other members of the local community and members of the global community. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Pass</title>
		<link>http://weblogg-ed.com/2006/rethinking-schools/comment-page-1/#comment-6106</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Pass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 20:58:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogg-ed.com/2006/rethinking-schools/#comment-6106</guid>
		<description>I think you raise a good suggestion.  I&#039;m teaching a religious school class of 5th graders this year in which I&#039;ve given my students the objectives and the resources for learning the material that they need to learn.  I simply let them learn.  While they are learning I walk around and support their learning, maybe asking questions, sometimes praising them and sometimes reminding them to work.  Imagine a situation in which every school had informal learning, which simultaneously promotes socialization.  Furthermore, with informal learning it&#039;s easier to teach multiple age groups. Do you think it&#039;s easier to do this in a one room school-house?

Andrew Pass
http://www.Pass-Ed.com/blogger.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you raise a good suggestion.  I&#8217;m teaching a religious school class of 5th graders this year in which I&#8217;ve given my students the objectives and the resources for learning the material that they need to learn.  I simply let them learn.  While they are learning I walk around and support their learning, maybe asking questions, sometimes praising them and sometimes reminding them to work.  Imagine a situation in which every school had informal learning, which simultaneously promotes socialization.  Furthermore, with informal learning it&#8217;s easier to teach multiple age groups. Do you think it&#8217;s easier to do this in a one room school-house?</p>
<p>Andrew Pass<br />
<a href="http://www.Pass-Ed.com/blogger.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.Pass-Ed.com/blogger.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jude</title>
		<link>http://weblogg-ed.com/2006/rethinking-schools/comment-page-1/#comment-6105</link>
		<dc:creator>Jude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 20:31:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogg-ed.com/2006/rethinking-schools/#comment-6105</guid>
		<description>Even if most children could walk to school, which is certainly true in my small town, most parents would drive them.  I speak from experience since I seem to be the only parent who walks with my children to events (they&#039;re in middle school).

At the moment, my kids&#039; public school has finally started a genuine gifted and talented program within the confines of the regular classroom and it&#039;s great--they&#039;re actually getting to do more challenging work without an increased workload.  It&#039;s as though they&#039;re in a school within a school.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even if most children could walk to school, which is certainly true in my small town, most parents would drive them.  I speak from experience since I seem to be the only parent who walks with my children to events (they&#8217;re in middle school).</p>
<p>At the moment, my kids&#8217; public school has finally started a genuine gifted and talented program within the confines of the regular classroom and it&#8217;s great&#8211;they&#8217;re actually getting to do more challenging work without an increased workload.  It&#8217;s as though they&#8217;re in a school within a school.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harold Jarche</title>
		<link>http://weblogg-ed.com/2006/rethinking-schools/comment-page-1/#comment-6104</link>
		<dc:creator>Harold Jarche</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 19:17:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogg-ed.com/2006/rethinking-schools/#comment-6104</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Will. I also came across this democratic school which recently opened in our region - http://www.fairfieldschool.org/
It&#039;s based on the Sudbury Valley School, in Framingham Massachusetts; do you know of it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Will. I also came across this democratic school which recently opened in our region &#8211; <a href="http://www.fairfieldschool.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.fairfieldschool.org/</a><br />
It&#8217;s based on the Sudbury Valley School, in Framingham Massachusetts; do you know of it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

