<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Teaching 2.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://weblogg-ed.com/2005/teaching-20-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://weblogg-ed.com/2005/teaching-20-2/</link>
	<description>The Read/Write Web in the Classroom</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 07:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Laura Little</title>
		<link>http://weblogg-ed.com/2005/teaching-20-2/#comment-1897</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura Little</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2005 16:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogg-ed.com/2005/teaching-20-2/#comment-1897</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;I think Level 3 would be connecting information. That includes problem-solving, constructivism, learning communities, etc., etc. 

But what about learning 5 and 6?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a>I think Level 3 would be connecting information. That includes problem-solving, constructivism, learning communities, etc., etc. </p>
<p>But what about learning 5 and 6?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Hoffman</title>
		<link>http://weblogg-ed.com/2005/teaching-20-2/#comment-1896</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Hoffman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2005 15:28:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogg-ed.com/2005/teaching-20-2/#comment-1896</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;How about "understanding" instead of "information?"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a>How about &#8220;understanding&#8221; instead of &#8220;information?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bud Hunt</title>
		<link>http://weblogg-ed.com/2005/teaching-20-2/#comment-1895</link>
		<dc:creator>Bud Hunt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2005 03:16:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogg-ed.com/2005/teaching-20-2/#comment-1895</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;Doug -- 

Wow -- Can I use this language?  It's fantastic.  I hate to seem ignorant -- but where is this rubric from, and how can I get more information like it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a>Doug &#8212; </p>
<p>Wow &#8212; Can I use this language?  It&#8217;s fantastic.  I hate to seem ignorant &#8212; but where is this rubric from, and how can I get more information like it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Douglas Johnson</title>
		<link>http://weblogg-ed.com/2005/teaching-20-2/#comment-1894</link>
		<dc:creator>Douglas Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 12:37:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogg-ed.com/2005/teaching-20-2/#comment-1894</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;Hi Jeff,

Yup. for what it's worth, here is the information problem-solving (research) rubric we use:

A Research Question Rubric
Level One: 	My research is about a broad topic. I can complete the assignment by using a general reference source such as an encyclopedia. I have no personal questions about the topic.
Primary example: My research is about an animal.
Secondary example: My research is about the economy of a state.

Level Two: 	My research answers a question that helps me narrow the focus of my search. This question may mean that I need to go to various sources to gather enough information to get a reliable answer. The conclusion of the research will ask me to give a supported answer to the question.
Primary example: What methods has my animal developed to help it survive?
Secondary example: What role has manufacturing played in an assigned state’s economic development?

Level Three: 	My research answers a question of personal relevance. To answer this question I may need to consult not just secondary sources such as magazines, newspapers, books or the Internet, but use primary sources of information such as original surveys, interviews, or source documents.
Primary example: What animal would be best for my family to adopt as a pet?
Secondary example: How can one best prepare for a career in manufacturing in my area?

Level Four: 	My research answers a personal question about the topic, and contains information that may be of use to decision-makers as they make policy or distribute funds. The result of my research is a well supported conclusion that contains a call for action on the part of an organization or government body. There will be a plan to distribute this information.
Primary example: How can our school help stop the growth in unwanted and abandoned animals in our community?
Secondary example: How might high schools change their curricula to meet the needs of students wanting a career in manufacturing in my state?

I'd say level 3 is authentic; level 4 is significant.

Doug</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a>Hi Jeff,</p>
<p>Yup. for what it&#8217;s worth, here is the information problem-solving (research) rubric we use:</p>
<p>A Research Question Rubric<br />
Level One: 	My research is about a broad topic. I can complete the assignment by using a general reference source such as an encyclopedia. I have no personal questions about the topic.<br />
Primary example: My research is about an animal.<br />
Secondary example: My research is about the economy of a state.</p>
<p>Level Two: 	My research answers a question that helps me narrow the focus of my search. This question may mean that I need to go to various sources to gather enough information to get a reliable answer. The conclusion of the research will ask me to give a supported answer to the question.<br />
Primary example: What methods has my animal developed to help it survive?<br />
Secondary example: What role has manufacturing played in an assigned state’s economic development?</p>
<p>Level Three: 	My research answers a question of personal relevance. To answer this question I may need to consult not just secondary sources such as magazines, newspapers, books or the Internet, but use primary sources of information such as original surveys, interviews, or source documents.<br />
Primary example: What animal would be best for my family to adopt as a pet?<br />
Secondary example: How can one best prepare for a career in manufacturing in my area?</p>
<p>Level Four: 	My research answers a personal question about the topic, and contains information that may be of use to decision-makers as they make policy or distribute funds. The result of my research is a well supported conclusion that contains a call for action on the part of an organization or government body. There will be a plan to distribute this information.<br />
Primary example: How can our school help stop the growth in unwanted and abandoned animals in our community?<br />
Secondary example: How might high schools change their curricula to meet the needs of students wanting a career in manufacturing in my state?</p>
<p>I&#8217;d say level 3 is authentic; level 4 is significant.</p>
<p>Doug</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Richardson</title>
		<link>http://weblogg-ed.com/2005/teaching-20-2/#comment-1893</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Richardson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 09:45:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogg-ed.com/2005/teaching-20-2/#comment-1893</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;So Tom. Help us out. If that's the wrong direction, what's the right one? You simply have to stop being so short and cryptic... ;0)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a>So Tom. Help us out. If that&#8217;s the wrong direction, what&#8217;s the right one? You simply have to stop being so short and cryptic&#8230; ;0)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tama</title>
		<link>http://weblogg-ed.com/2005/teaching-20-2/#comment-1892</link>
		<dc:creator>Tama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 02:42:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogg-ed.com/2005/teaching-20-2/#comment-1892</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;IF you need to work the concept around information, I think I'd characterise the process instead as...
Teaching 1.0 - Information delivery
Teaching 2.0 - Information as conversation

BUT I'd prefer to see

Teaching &#38; Learning 2.0 - Information &#60;=&#62; Conversation!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a>IF you need to work the concept around information, I think I&#8217;d characterise the process instead as&#8230;<br />
Teaching 1.0 - Information delivery<br />
Teaching 2.0 - Information as conversation</p>
<p>BUT I&#8217;d prefer to see</p>
<p>Teaching &amp; Learning 2.0 - Information &lt;=&gt; Conversation!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Utecht</title>
		<link>http://weblogg-ed.com/2005/teaching-20-2/#comment-1891</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Utecht</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 00:14:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogg-ed.com/2005/teaching-20-2/#comment-1891</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;Doug,

Could we say Teaching 4.0 information to solve authentic problems.

???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a>Doug,</p>
<p>Could we say Teaching 4.0 information to solve authentic problems.</p>
<p>???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Douglas Johnson</title>
		<link>http://weblogg-ed.com/2005/teaching-20-2/#comment-1890</link>
		<dc:creator>Douglas Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2005 23:59:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogg-ed.com/2005/teaching-20-2/#comment-1890</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;Teaching 3.0 information to solve problems.
Teaching 4.0 information to solve significant problems.

???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a>Teaching 3.0 information to solve problems.<br />
Teaching 4.0 information to solve significant problems.</p>
<p>???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Hoffman</title>
		<link>http://weblogg-ed.com/2005/teaching-20-2/#comment-1889</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Hoffman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2005 23:07:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogg-ed.com/2005/teaching-20-2/#comment-1889</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;I think when you frame your definition of teaching around "information" you're already marching in the wrong direction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a>I think when you frame your definition of teaching around &#8220;information&#8221; you&#8217;re already marching in the wrong direction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
