<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Horizontal Classrooms</title>
	<atom:link href="http://weblogg-ed.com/2005/horizontal-classrooms/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://weblogg-ed.com/2005/horizontal-classrooms/</link>
	<description>Learning with the Read/Write Web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 20:36:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry Elliott</title>
		<link>http://weblogg-ed.com/2005/horizontal-classrooms/comment-page-1/#comment-1412</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry Elliott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2005 01:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblogg-ed.com/2005/horizontal-classrooms/#comment-1412</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;I agree and disagree with you simultaneously.  I can&#039;t imagine a more wishy-washy opening (mine, that is).  Let me explain.

I am reminded more and more of Edwin Abbott&#039;s math fantasy/satire &quot;Flatland&quot;.  Weblogs and folksonomic technologies are the incomprehensible world of 3-D while hierarchical, taxonomic technologies (learning management systems like Blackboard and WebCT spring to mind)are the 2-D flatlanders.  I would turn Friedman&#039;s metaphor of flattening on its head and demand that we view the world as becoming more multidimensional all the time.  We are moving toward a metaphor we don&#039;t understand, not toward one that we do.  That&#039;s the bite of it.  Moses couldn&#039;t delineate the promised land, but he sensed it. As Abbott said in his seminal book, &quot;Flatlanders tell the truth about flatland.&quot; In the parlance of his book, we (you, me, and tech attuned) are squares who have been touched by a sphere. We live in a world we know ain&#039;t &quot;right&quot;,  but knowing that doesn&#039;t mean we know what is true.  It is the mystery Faulkner spoke of when he said we should never mistake the facts for the truth.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a>I agree and disagree with you simultaneously.  I can&#8217;t imagine a more wishy-washy opening (mine, that is).  Let me explain.</p>
<p>I am reminded more and more of Edwin Abbott&#8217;s math fantasy/satire &#8220;Flatland&#8221;.  Weblogs and folksonomic technologies are the incomprehensible world of 3-D while hierarchical, taxonomic technologies (learning management systems like Blackboard and WebCT spring to mind)are the 2-D flatlanders.  I would turn Friedman&#8217;s metaphor of flattening on its head and demand that we view the world as becoming more multidimensional all the time.  We are moving toward a metaphor we don&#8217;t understand, not toward one that we do.  That&#8217;s the bite of it.  Moses couldn&#8217;t delineate the promised land, but he sensed it. As Abbott said in his seminal book, &#8220;Flatlanders tell the truth about flatland.&#8221; In the parlance of his book, we (you, me, and tech attuned) are squares who have been touched by a sphere. We live in a world we know ain&#8217;t &#8220;right&#8221;,  but knowing that doesn&#8217;t mean we know what is true.  It is the mystery Faulkner spoke of when he said we should never mistake the facts for the truth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

